I'm often asked what it's like to try a case in front of a jury, in terms of the step-by-step process and also what's it's like for me. As a writer, you'd think a flowery description would satisfy those interested in my answer.
But even a writer knows that a picture can be worth a thousand words.
So here it is:
First, I eyeball the jury panel...
Then I try to weed out the less analytical ones,
and retain the intelligent, ones who express themselves well.
Once that's done, we start opening statements and I tell them about the case, using visual aids.
Then the defense lawyer stands up and gives his opening statement...
My case-in-chief starts, and I present the evidence that's been collected by the cops (watch closely or you'll miss it)...
.... and put questions to my stoic but deeply affected victim....
... and present rock-solid scientific evidence.
When I'm done, the defense puts on their witnesses.
Finally, I give my eloquent closing argument, hoping the jury will remember my victim and be all...
But I first have to listen to the defense lawyer giving his closing,
which makes me feel totally...
but I'm a professional, so I force myself to give it some...
Then my part is all over, and I wait for the the verdict...
If it's a 'Not Guilty,' I feel kinda...
.. but at most you'll just see...
Whereas, if it's a 'Guilty' verdict, I wanna be all...
But this is serious business, so I remind myself,
But whatever the verdict, I go home and get one of these...
... and then mix one of these.
Because pretty soon, I'll be doing it all over again!
(Note: Much credit to Nathan Bransford for inspiring this blog post, which I deem a poor knock-off of his, which is utterly genius and called The Publishing Process in GIF Form)
Sweet description! (Nathan Bransford's is great too.)
ReplyDeleteLove, love, love this! LOL. Excellent post!
ReplyDeleteLove it, Mark. (Especially the Defense Attorney. :p )
ReplyDelete